Skip navigation

U.S. v. Wims, No. 98-3684 (11th Cir.) (245 F.3d 1269) (March 28, 2001) (Per Curiam)

On remand from the Supreme Court in light of Apprendi, the Eleventh Circuit declined to vacate the sentence that had been imposed on the grounds that there was no plain error since the only evidence regarding the quantity of drugs was uncontested.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login