U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (273 F.3d 991) (November 20, 2001) (Judge R. Lanier III Anderson)
Loaded on Nov. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
November 05, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Procedural Default/Error.
This decision is noted for Judge Tjoflat’s highly persuasive dissent on the topic of the retroactive use of Apprendi on appeals. That dissent is particularly noteworthy because it eschews the common approach to the Apprendi retroactivity arguments (“My God, it will open up the floodgates of appeals”) and instead focuses ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (273 F.3d 991) (November 20, 2001) (Judge R. Lanier III Anderson)
- Jarrett v. U.S., No. 00-3213 (8th Cir.) (266 F.3d 789) (October 2, 2001) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Alvarez, No. 00-1285 (6th Cir.) (266 F.3d 587) (September 28, 2001) (Judge Joseph M. Hood)
- U.S. v. Liss, No. 00-14134 (11th Cir.) (265 F.3d 1220) (September 21, 2001) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- Alvarez-Machain v. U.S., No. 99-56762 (9th Cir.) (266 F.3d 1045) (September 11, 2001) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- Brackett v. U.S., No. 01-1466 (1st Cir.) (270 F.3d 60) (October 31, 2001) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- U.S. v. McCabe, No. 01-1445 (8th Cir.) (270 F.3d 588) (November 5, 2001) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- Ashley v. U.S., No. 01-1733 (7th Cir.) (266 F.3d 671) (September 12, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Roper, No. 99-6693 (6th Cir.) (266 F.3d 526) (September 21, 2001) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
- U.S. v. Tighe, No. 00-30263 (9th Cir.) (266 F.3d 1187) (September 24, 2001) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
- U.S. v. Knight, No. 99-5642 (3rd Cir.) (266 F.3d 203) (September 6, 2001) (Judge Carol Los Mansmann)
- U.S. v. Gamma Tech Indus., No. 99-50730 (9th Cir.) (265 F.3d 917) (September 11, 2001) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Adams, No. 99-6008 (6th Cir.) (265 F.3d 420) (September 10, 2001) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. Haney, No. 00-6129 (10th Cir.) (264 F.3d 1161) (August 29, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Busekros, No. 00-3339 (10th Cir.) (264 F.3d 1158) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- Rico v. Leftridge-Byrd, No. Civ. No. 00-4841 (E.D.Pa.) (2001 WL 1428351) (November 8, 2001) (Judge William H. Jr. Yohn)
- U.S. v. Mackey, No. 00-5666 (6th Cir.) (265 F.3d 457) (September 12, 2001) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko, No. 00-860 (U.S. Supreme Court) (534 U.S. 61; 122 S.Ct. 515) (November 27, 2001) (Justice Rehnquist)
- U.S. v. Lynch, No. 00-30247 (9th Cir.) (265 F.3d 758) (September 4, 2001) (Judge J. Clifford Wallace)
- U.S. v. Holt, No. 99-7150 (10th Cir.) (264 F.3d 1215) (September 5, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. ex re. Derrick Hardaway v. Young, No. 01 C 3963 (N.D.Ill.) (162 F.Supp.2d 1005) (September 13, 2001) (Judge Milton I. Shadur)
- U.S. v. Alanis, No. 00-3073 (7th Cir.) (265 F.3d 576) (September 7, 2001) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
More from these topics:
- Kansas Supreme Court Announces Complete and Wrongful Denial of Defendant’s Constitutional Right to Testify Constitutes ‘Structural Error’ and Reverses Convictions Where Defendant Removed From Stand and Entire Testimony Stricken, Oct. 1, 2024. Procedural Default/Error, Right to Testify, Right to Testify/Remain Silent.
- U.S. Supreme Court Apparently Prioritizes Ideology Over Guilt or Innocence, Jan. 15, 2024. AEDPA, Procedural Default/Error, Proving Cause, Capital Cases, Procedural Error, Effective Assistance of Counsel, Counsel - Right to, Counsel - Effective Assistance of, Strickland Standard, Per se ineffectiveness, Right to Counsel.
- Third Circuit Vacates Denial of First Step Act Relief Because District Court’s Failure to Expressly Identify Which § 841(b) Provision Supported Sentence Precludes Appellate Review, Oct. 1, 2023. First Step Act, Procedural Default/Error, Resentencing.
- SCOTUS Announces Statute of Limitations for § 1983 Claim Challenging State’s Postconviction DNA Testing Procedures Begins to Run Upon Completion of State-Court Litigation, Including Appeals, May 15, 2023. DNA Testing/Samples, Procedural Default/Error.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Federal Drug Conspiracy Conviction Because District Court Failed to Ensure Defendant Understood ‘Agreement’ Element of Conspiracy and Failed to Ensure Factual Basis for Guilty Plea, April 15, 2023. Procedural Default/Error, Conspiracies, Attempts, Solicitations, Knowingly and Voluntarily Made.
- Seventh Circuit: District Court’s Failure to Address Nonfrivolous Argument Raised in First Step Act Motion Constitutes Procedural Error in Violation of Concepcion, April 15, 2023. Frivolous Litigation (PLRA), First Step Act, Procedural Default/Error.
- SCOTUS: Arizona Supreme Court’s Interpretation of State Procedural Rule so ‘Novel and Unforeseeable’ It’s Not ‘Adequate’ to Preclude SCOTUS Review of Federal Death-Penalty Claim, March 15, 2023. Death Penalty, Procedural Default/Error.
- Fifth Circuit: District Court Erred in Finding That a Fourth Amendment Stop Did Not Occur, Jan. 15, 2023. Procedural Default/Error, Terry Stops.
- Florida Supreme Court: Trial Courts Have Authority to Correct Sentencing Errors, But Subject to Time Limits, Jan. 1, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Procedural Default/Error, Timeliness.
- Fifth Circuit: New, Retroactive Supreme Court Decision Allowing SOS Habeas Petition Not New Enough to Avoid Procedural-Default Bar, Sept. 15, 2022. AEDPA, Procedural Default/Error.