Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hare, No. 00-3002 (7th Cir.) (269 F.3d 859) (October 22, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

Although the Court quickly rejected the defendant's contention, this is the first case we have seen in which a defendant challenged a waiver of appeal provision in a plea agreement as void because it constitutes a contract of adhesion.

It is hard to pinpoint precisely when appeal waiver provisions first ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login