Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Kelly, No. 00-2705 (3rd Cir.) (272 F.3d 622) (December 5, 2001) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Nov. 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists November 26, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Constitutional Challenges.

As most Apprendi-watchers know, on August 9, 2001, a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit issued a highly controversial ruling to the effect that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) and (B), two of the main provisions of the most commonly used Federal drug statute, are facially unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Lewko, No. 01-1231 (1st Cir.) (269 F.3d 64) (October 25, 2001) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
  2. U.S. v. Hall, No. 00-3879 (8th Cir.) (269 F.3d 940) (October 19, 2001) (Judge James B. Loken)
  3. U.S. v. Hare, No. 00-3002 (7th Cir.) (269 F.3d 859) (October 22, 2001) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  4. U.S. v. Thomas, No. 98-1051 (2nd Cir.) (274 F.3d 655) (December 12, 2001) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
  5. U.S. v. Khattak, No. 00-4169 (3rd Cir.) (273 F.3d 557) (December 6, 2001) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
  6. U.S. v. Velarde-Gomez, No. 99-50602 (9th Cir.) (269 F.3d 1023) (October 23, 2001) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
  7. U.S. v. Dinnall, No. 99-4936 (4th Cir.) (269 F.3d 418) (October 15, 2001) (Judge H. Emory Jr. Widener)
  8. U.S. v. Kelly, No. 00-2705 (3rd Cir.) (272 F.3d 622) (December 5, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  9. Brumley v. Wingard, No. 00-3515 (6th Cir.) (269 F.3d 629) (October 11, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
  10. U.S. v. Carrillo, No. 00-2643 (7th Cir.) (269 F.3d 761) (October 18, 2001) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
  11. U.S. v. Rodriguez-Aguirre, No. 00-2337 (10th Cir.) (264 F.3d 1195) (September 5, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
  12. U.S. v. Potes Ramirez, No. 00-11432 (11th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1310) (August 10, 2001) (Judge Frank May Hull)

More from these topics: