U.S. v. Correa-Gomez, No. Cr.A. 01-32 (E.D.Ky.) (160 F.Supp.2d 748) (August 31, 2001) (Judge Henry R. Jr. Wilhoit)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
October 22, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Selective Prosecution/Enforcement.
In U.S. v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456 (1996), the Supreme Court held that, to prove a selective prosecution case, the claimant must prove two elements: first, he must demonstrate that the Federal prosecutorial policy had a discriminatory effect; and, second, that it was motivated by a discriminatory purpose.
Since …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. McFarland, No. 00-10569 (5th Cir.) (264 F.3d 557) (August 29, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Lopez, No. 00-20506 (5th Cir.) (264 F.3d 527) (August 29, 2001) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
- U.S. v. Bollin, No. 00-4337 (4th Cir.) (264 F.3d 391) (June 7, 2001) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Purdy, No. 00-30168 (9th Cir.) (264 F.3d 809) (August 31, 2001) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Correa-Gomez, No. Cr.A. 01-32 (E.D.Ky.) (160 F.Supp.2d 748) (August 31, 2001) (Judge Henry R. Jr. Wilhoit)
- U.S. v. Schulte, No. 00-3301 (6th Cir.) (264 F.3d 656) (September 4, 2001) (Judge Thomas A. Jr. Wiseman)
- Gerber v. Hickman, No. 00-16494 (9th Cir.) (264 F.3d 882) (September 5, 2001) (Judge Myron H. Bright)
- U.S. v. Idarraga, No. 00 Cr. 979 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y.) (October 31, 2001) (Judge Loretta A. Preska)
- U.S. v. Elliott, No. 00-5010 (10th Cir.) (264 F.3d 1171) (August 30, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Gregory, No. CR. 99-00494-SOM (D.Hawai'I) (160 F.Supp.2d 1166) (August 3, 2001) (Judge Susan Oki Mollway)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 00-50238 (9th Cir.) (264 F.3d 813) (September 4, 2001) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. McAllister, No. 00-4423 (4th Cir.) (272 F.3d 228) (November 8, 2001) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Reed, No. 00-1681 (6th Cir.) (264 F.3d 640) (August 31, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Alrub, No. 00 CR 76 (N.D.Ill.) (160 F.Supp.2d 988) (September 5, 2001) (Judge Robert W. Gettleman)
- U.S. v. Gill, No. 00-10304 (9th Cir.) (264 F.3d 929) (September 6, 2001) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Reed, No. 00-1681 (6th Cir.) (264 F.3d 640) (August 31, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-40844 (5th Cir.) (264 F.3d 518) (August 28, 2001) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Overturns Oklahoma Prisoner’s Death Sentence After More than 25 Years on Death Row, Nov. 1, 2025. Ex Post Facto, Good Time, Wrongful Conviction, Habeas Corpus, Wrongful Imprisonment, Pardons/Clemency, First Step Act, Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA), Specific Offenses, Controlled Substances, Weapons, Accuracy of Information, Depraved Indifference Murder, Evidence - Circumstantial, Theft, Failure to Disclose, Perjury/Perjured Testimony, Evidence - Failure to Disclose, New Trial - Motions for, Pleas Linked to Cooperation, Evidence - Destruction/Fabrication/Manipulation of, Selective Prosecution/Enforcement, Improper Comments, Official Report, Withholding of Exculpatory Evidence, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
- Seventh Circuit: District Court’s Failure to Exercise Discretion After Erroneously Finding Defendant Ineligible for Relief Under First Step Act Was Abuse of Discretion, June 15, 2022. First Step Act, Selective Prosecution/Enforcement.
- Pennsylvania Prosecutors Cash in on Low-Level Drug Crimes, April 15, 2020. Criticism of Government, Selective Prosecution/Enforcement.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.