U.S. v. Hester, No. 97-9232 (11th Cir.) (262 F.3d 1258) (August 9, 2001) (Judge Susan H. Black)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
October 08, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Danser, No. 99-4251 (7th Cir.) (270 F.3d 451) (October 25, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Wells, No. 00-10134 (5th Cir.) (262 F.3d 455) (August 16, 2001) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
- Yahweh v. U.S. Parole Com'n., No. 01-2848-CIV-MOORE (S.D.Fla.) (158 F.Supp.2d 1332) (August 15, 2001) (Judge K. Michael Moore)
- U.S. v. Monteiro, No. 01-1564 (7th Cir.) (270 F.3d 465) (October 26, 2001) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- Green v. U.S., No. 00-2624 (8th Cir.) (262 F.3d 715) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Sherman, No. 00-2184 (8th Cir.) (262 F.3d 784) (August 21, 2001) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
- U.S. v. Hester, No. 97-9232 (11th Cir.) (262 F.3d 1258) (August 9, 2001) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- U.S. v. Merced, No. 00-1810 (2nd Cir.) (263 F.3d 34) (August 29, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Scarfo, No. 00-4313 (3rd Cir.) (263 F.3d 80) (August 27, 2001) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Orso, No. 99-50328 (9th Cir.) (266 F.3d 1030) (September 17, 2001) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
More from these topics:
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.