Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rodriguez-Aguirre, No. 00-2337 (10th Cir.) (264 F.3d 1195) (September 5, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)

Here the Court held that when the Government seizes property, but never institutes formal forfeiture proceedings, the statute of limitations does not begin to run for Rule 41(e) motions until the conclusion of the criminal proceedings against the claimant.

In 1994, the four appellants in this case were convicted of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login