U.S. v. Berry, No. 00-30222 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 971) (August 2, 2001) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
September 10, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Factual Disputes/Findings.
The defendant in this case challenged the district court's reliance on the hearsay statements of his co-defendants at sentencing, alleging that: (1) the statements were inherently unreliable in that they were self-serving statements designed to divert blame away from the co-defendants and onto himself; (2) the court erred in failing ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Cathey, No. 00-10414 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 365) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Spinello, No. 00-3504 (3rd Cir.) (265 F.3d 150) (September 11, 2001) (Judge Maryanne Trump Barry)
- U.S. v. Castano-Vasquez, No. 00-3861 (3rd Cir.) (266 F.3d 228) (September 17, 2001) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. Panduro, No. 00 CR 107(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (152 F.Supp.2d 398) (May 31, 2001) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
- U.S. v. Castro-Hernandez, No. 01-50192 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1057) (August 6, 2001) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Photogrammetric Data Services, Inc., No. 00-4498 (4th Cir.) (259 F.3d 229) (July 30, 2001) (Judge William B. Jr. Traxler)
- U.S. v. Naranjo, No. 00-50203 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 379) (July 23, 2001) (Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale)
- U.S. v. Alvarez-Pineda, No. 99-2313 (10th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1230) (August 3, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Mayweathers v. Newland, No. 00-16708 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 930) (August 2, 2001) (Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson)
- Ali v. Johnson, No. 00-10777 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 317) (July 11, 2001) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Hunerlach, No. 00-12340 (11th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1282) (July 27, 2001) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 00-50406 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 355) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
- U.S. v. Lopez, No. 00-50594 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1053) (August 6, 2001) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Randle, No. 97-20360 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 319) (July 17, 2001) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Longoria, No. 00-50405 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 363) (July 19, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Berry, No. 00-30222 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 971) (August 2, 2001) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Clear Error’ Review Applies to District Courts’ Factual Findings for Brady Challenges and Affirms District Court’s Mid-Trial Order Excluding Witness Testimony and Imposing Monetary Sanctions for Government’s Brady Violation, Feb. 1, 2025. Sanctions, Eyewitness Testimony, Brady Rule violations, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Factual Disputes/Findings, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Study: ‘Inconclusive Finding’ by Examiner of Cartridge Casing Should Be Finding of ‘Excluded’ 85% of the Time, Nov. 1, 2023. junk science, Evidence - Admissibility, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- California Court of Appeal: ‘Actual Killer’ Under Felony-Murder Rule Means Person ‘Who Personally Killed the Victim”, Feb. 15, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- California Court of Appeal: At Felony-Murder Resentencing Hearing, Court May Not Deny Relief Based on Findings That Are Inconsistent With Previous Acquittal, Jan. 15, 2023. New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal, Resentencing, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.