Skip navigation

U.S. v. Carrera, No. 00-1234 (7th Cir.) (259 F.3d 818) (August 3, 2001) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)

In this case the Court explained that a finding that the defendant "was not completely hinest in his admissions is an appropriate independent justification for denying the reduction" for acceotance of responsibility. (Id., at 828) (finding that the "lack of trustworthiness in [Carrera's] admissions, his limited admissions, and his changing ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login