Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Coward, No. CRIM. 00-88 (E.D.Pa.) (151 F.Supp.2d 544) (April 10, 2001) (Judge Stewart Dalzell)

Loaded on Sept. 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists March 26, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Interstate Commerce - Effect on.

This is an interesting decision in which Judge Dalzell raised some significant questions about the continuing validity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Scarborough v. U.S., 431 U.S. 563 (1977), where the Court held that in order to convict a felon of unlawful possession of a firearm under the predecessor ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Coward, No. CRIM. 00-88 (E.D.Pa.) (151 F.Supp.2d 544) (April 10, 2001) (Judge Stewart Dalzell)
  2. Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of Humboldt, No. 98-17250 (9th Cir.) (240 F.3d 1185) (January 31, 2001) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
  3. Doe v. Otte, No. 99-35845 (9th Cir.) (248 F.3d 832) (April 9, 2001) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
  4. U.S. v. Sanders, No. 00-6281 (4th Cir.) (247 F.3d 139) (April 13, 2001) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)
  5. U.S. v. Dolah, No. 00-1173(L) (2nd Cir.) (245 F.3d 98) (March 26, 2001) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
  6. Mapp v. Reno, No. 99-2735 (2nd Cir.) (241 F.3d 221) (February 23, 2001) (Judge Guido Calabresi)

More from these topics: