Skip navigation

U.S. v. Faasse, No. 98-2337 (6th Cir.) (265 F.3d 475) (September 14, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)

Here, over the strong dissent of Judge Batchelder, the en banc Court reversed a prior panel's decision which held that certain portions of the Child Support Recovery Act (18 U.S.C. § 228) violated the Commerce Clause, under the teachings of U.S. v. Lopez.

Here, over the dissent of Judge Batchelder, …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login