Skip navigation

U.S. v. Faasse, No. 98-2337 (6th Cir.) (265 F.3d 475) (September 14, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)

Here, over the dissent of Judge Batchelder, the en banc court vacated the prior panel's decision (reported at 227 F.3d 660) which held that portions of the Child Support Recovery Act (CSRA) were unconstitutional as an improper exercise of Congress' Commerce Clause authority, based upon the Supreme Court's decision in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login