U.S. v. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, No. 00-2014 (1st Cir.) (258 F.3d 16) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
September 03, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
As stated by the Court: "This case presents a question this court previously reserved: what is the standard to be applied to a criminal defendant's motion for a new trial where the claim is that the prosecution knowingly used perjured testimony." (Id., at 18).
In this case, the defendant sought ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Laster, No. 99-6244 (6th Cir.) (258 F.3d 525) (July 26, 2001) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- U.S. v. Ruiz, No. 99-10224 (9th Cir.) (257 F.3d 1030) (July 23, 2001) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, No. 00-2014 (1st Cir.) (258 F.3d 16) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- U.S. v. Hill, No. 00-41259 (5th Cir.) (258 F.3d 355) (July 11, 2001) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
- U.S. v. Stafford, No. 99-5706 (6th Cir.) (258 F.3d 465) (July 17, 2001) (Judge Gerald E. Rosen)
- U.S. v. Laster, No. 99-6244 (6th Cir.) (258 F.3d 525) (July 26, 2001) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- U.S. v. Burke, No. 00-10828 (11th Cir.) (257 F.3d 1321) (July 20, 2001) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Johnston, No. 99-20810 (5th Cir.) (258 F.3d 361) (July 13, 2001) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Jarvis, No. 00-1514 (3rd Cir.) (258 F.3d 235) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. $10,700 in U.S. Currency, No. 00-1635 (3rd Cir.) (258 F.3d 215) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Hollingsworth, No. 00-2482 (8th Cir.) (257 F.3d 871) (July 30, 2001) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Faasse, No. 98-2337 (6th Cir.) (265 F.3d 475) (September 14, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- In Re: Turner, No. 00-2660 (3rd Cir.) (267 F.3d 225) (September 21, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 00-1967 (7th Cir.) (258 F.3d 582) (July 12, 2001) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood)
- Rosario v. U.S., No. 00 CIV 9695 (S.D.N.Y.) (2001 WL 1006641) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Robert J. Ward)
- U.S. v. Maynie, No. 00-1264 (8th Cir.) (257 F.3d 908) (July 30, 2001) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- Hart v. Massanari, No. 99-56472 (9th Cir.) (266 F.3d 1155) (September 24, 2001) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- Hart v. Massanari, No. 99-56472 (9th Cir.) (266 F.3d 1155) (September 24, 2001) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. James, No. 00-3292 (10th Cir.) (257 F.3d 1173) (July 16, 2001) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)
- Henderson v. Norris, No. 00-2203 (8th Cir.) (258 F.3d 706) (July 9, 2001) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.