Skip navigation

U.S. v. James, No. 00-3292 (10th Cir.) (257 F.3d 1173) (July 16, 2001) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)

One of the many issues raised on appeal by the defendant in this case was his claim that the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 430 U.S. 466 (2000) rendered 21 U.S.C. facially unconstitutional. In rejecting that claim, the Court reasoned as follows:

“The Apprendi decision required this ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login