Skip navigation

U.S. v. Laster, No. 99-6244 (6th Cir.) (258 F.3d 525) (July 26, 2001) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)

Here the Court rejected the defendants' contention that the Apprendi rule required the jury to determine whether they intended to create D- or L-methamphetamine, since that determination would not have affected their statutory maximum.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login