U.S. v. Randle, No. 97-20360 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 319) (July 17, 2001) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
September 10, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here, on remand from the Supreme Court, the Court vacated a sentence imposed in a drug case where the jury was "not even inferentially asked" to determine the quantity of drugs - in the interests of fairness and consistency.
In this case, the defendant's sentence exceeded the statutory maximum based ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Cathey, No. 00-10414 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 365) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Spinello, No. 00-3504 (3rd Cir.) (265 F.3d 150) (September 11, 2001) (Judge Maryanne Trump Barry)
- U.S. v. Castano-Vasquez, No. 00-3861 (3rd Cir.) (266 F.3d 228) (September 17, 2001) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. Panduro, No. 00 CR 107(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (152 F.Supp.2d 398) (May 31, 2001) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
- U.S. v. Castro-Hernandez, No. 01-50192 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1057) (August 6, 2001) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Photogrammetric Data Services, Inc., No. 00-4498 (4th Cir.) (259 F.3d 229) (July 30, 2001) (Judge William B. Jr. Traxler)
- U.S. v. Naranjo, No. 00-50203 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 379) (July 23, 2001) (Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale)
- U.S. v. Alvarez-Pineda, No. 99-2313 (10th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1230) (August 3, 2001) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Mayweathers v. Newland, No. 00-16708 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 930) (August 2, 2001) (Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson)
- Ali v. Johnson, No. 00-10777 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 317) (July 11, 2001) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Hunerlach, No. 00-12340 (11th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1282) (July 27, 2001) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 00-50406 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 355) (July 19, 2001) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
- U.S. v. Lopez, No. 00-50594 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1053) (August 6, 2001) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Randle, No. 97-20360 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 319) (July 17, 2001) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Longoria, No. 00-50405 (5th Cir.) (259 F.3d 363) (July 19, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Berry, No. 00-30222 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 971) (August 2, 2001) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.