U.S. v. Hicks, No. 01-3040 (D.C. Cir.) (283 F.3d 380) (March 26, 2002) (Judge Harry T. Edwards)
Here the Court held that a defendant does not meet the standards for timely "relating back" (under Rule 15 of the Fed.R.Civ.P.) to an original application for collateral habeas relief where attempts to amend a Section 2255 motion under Apprendi raise an entirely new legal claim, arising from a new ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login