Napue v. Illinois, No. 583 (U.S. Supreme Court) (360 U.S. 264; 79 S.Ct. 1173) (June 15, 2059) (Justice Warren)

Loaded on April 26, 2002

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.

In this case the defendant was charged with murder. At his trial, the State's principal witness, one George Hamer, and a man doing time for the same murder with which Napue was charged, testified in response to a question by the prosecutor that he had received no promise of consideration ...

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from these topics:

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Affirms Granting of New Trial in Murder Case Based on IAC Where Counsel Failed to Investigate Exculpatory Evidence Contained in a Proffer and Provided to Counsel Prior to Trial, May 15, 2023. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
California Supreme Court Announces Government’s Continuing Brady Obligations and Ethical Duty of Disclosure During Habeas Proceedings Regarding Alleged Exculpatory Evidence Available at Time of Trial but Suppressed, April 15, 2023. Habeas Corpus, Suppression, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
Iowa Supreme Court Announces Brady Standard Applies to Motion for New Trial Based on Withheld Exculpatory Medical Records, April 15, 2021. Medical Records, Brady Rule violations, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
Third Circuit: Brady Claims in Habeas Petitions Timely When Filed Within One Year of Date Reason to Believe Prosecutor Violated Duty To Disclose, March 15, 2021. Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Timeliness of Motion, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.