U.S. v. Carrington, No. 99-4537 (4th Cir.) (301 F.3d 204) (August 22, 2002) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
August 05, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
Here the Court held that, although a sentence based on 1) an indictment that failed to specify drug quantity and 2) absence of a jury finding as to quantity, was plain error under Apprendi, sentence is affirmed where evidence of drug quantity justifying the sentence was overwhelming and uncontroverted.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft, No. 02-1437 (6th Cir.) (303 F.3d 681) (August 26, 2002) (Judge Damon J. Keith)
- U.S. v. Carrington, No. 99-4537 (4th Cir.) (301 F.3d 204) (August 22, 2002) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Smalley, No. 01-3898 (8th Cir.) (294 F.3d 1030) (June 28, 2002) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Travis, No. 01-3954 (7th Cir.) (294 F.3d 837) (June 19, 2002) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- U.S. v. Noble, No. 01-4287 (7th Cir.) (299 F.3d 907) (August 20, 2002) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
- Vargas v. U.S., No. 01 Civ. 5527(VM) (S.D.N.Y.) (207 F.Supp.2d 304) (July 27, 2002) (Judge Victor Marrero)
- U.S. v. Reid, No. CR.A. 02-10013-WGY (D.Mass.) (206 F.Supp.2d 132) (June 11, 2002) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 01-2605 (3rd Cir.) (294 F.3d 473) (June 24, 2002) (Judge Richard L. Nygaard)
- U.S. v. Mezvinsky, No. CRIM.01-156 (W.D.Pa.) (206 F.Supp.2d 661) (June 3, 2002) (Judge Stewart Dalzell)
- Parrado v. U.S., No. 01 Civ. 2892(PKL) (S.D.N.Y.) (207 F.Supp.2d 230) (June 24, 2002) (Judge Peter K. Leisure)
- U.S. v. Gebbie, No. 01-1812 (3rd Cir.) (294 F.3d 540) (June 28, 2002) (Judge Richard L. Nygaard)
- U.S. v. Lopez, No. 01-1390 (1st Cir.) (300 F.3d 46) (August 20, 2002) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- In Re All Matters Submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, No. 02-429 (F.I.S.C.) (218 F.Supp.2d 611) (May 17, 2002) (Judge Royce C. Lamberth)
- U.S. v. Finley, No. 01-10087 (9th Cir.) (301 F.3d 1000) (August 20, 2002) (Judge Myron H. Bright)
More from these topics:
- First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, Not Specific Performance by District Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Recommend the Sentence Promised, Plain Error, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas, Acceptance/Rejection by the Court.
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.