Skip navigation

U.S. v. Romano, No. 00-11505 (11th Cir.) (314 F.3d 1279) (December 20, 2002) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)

This case is noted for its rare - but refreshing - departure from what is rapidly becoming the standard judicial refrain to almost every claim of error under Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b) - namely that while there was error, and while it was plain, and while it did affect the defendant’s substantial ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login