Skip navigation

U.S. v. Agramonte, No. 00-3098 (D.C. Cir.) (276 F.3d 594) (December 28, 2001) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)

Here the Court refused to extend the Supreme Court's ruling in Apprendi to cover situations in which the district court's findings trigger a mandatory minimum sentence.

The defendant was convicted of various drug crimes, including selling crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school in violation of 21 U.S.C. § ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login