U.S. v. Hough, No. 00-3380 (6th Cir.) (276 F.3d 884) (January 16, 2002) (Judge R. Guy Jr. Cole)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
February 11, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here the Court affirmed its rule that Apprendi does not require the jury to determine the precise amount of drugs in every case unless the quantity alleged threatens a penalty that is higher than the statuory maximum.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Akins, No. 99-30241 (9th Cir.) (276 F.3d 1141) (January 10, 2002) (Judge Dorothy Wright Nelson)
- Porter v. Nussle, No. 00-853 (U.S. Supreme Court) (534 U.S. 516; 122 S.Ct. 983) (February 26, 2002) (Justice Ginsburg)
- U.S. v. Agramonte, No. 00-3098 (D.C. Cir.) (276 F.3d 594) (December 28, 2001) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Hough, No. 00-3380 (6th Cir.) (276 F.3d 884) (January 16, 2002) (Judge R. Guy Jr. Cole)
- U.S. v. Brown, No. 01-1623 (7th Cir.) (276 F.3d 930) (January 10, 2002) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Jackson, No. 01-10396 (11th Cir.) (276 F.3d 1231) (December 21, 2001) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)
- U.S. v. Henry, No. 01-2486 (3rd Cir.) (282 F.3d 242) (March 4, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Sanchez-Cervantes, No. 98-35897 (9th Cir.) (282 F.3d 664) (March 1, 2002) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)
- Daniel v. Cockrell, No. 00-20624 (5th Cir.) (283 F.3d 697) (February 25, 2002) (Judge Will L. Garwood)
- U.S. v. Marino, No. 00-1739 (1st Cir.) (277 F.3d 11) (January 14, 2002) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- U.S. v. Marino, No. 00-1739 (1st Cir.) (277 F.3d 11) (January 14, 2002) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- U.S. v. Levenite, No. 00-4197 (4th Cir.) (277 F.3d 454) (January 10, 2002) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.