Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Larson v. U.S., No. 00-2455 (1st Cir.) (274 F.3d 643) (December 27, 2001) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2002 published in Punch and Jurists January 21, 2002
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Return/Retention of Property.

This case is noted principally as a reminder that the forfeiture laws now require the Government to pay interest on funds which it seizes from a claimant pursuant to a forfeiture proceeding, but which are ultimately returned to the claimant when the forfeiture proceedings are dropped or otherwise terminated.

In ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Mitchell, No. 00-1366 (10th Cir.) (274 F.3d 1307) (October 23, 2001) (Judge Robert H. McWilliams)
  2. U.S. v. Farmer, No. 00-4580 (4th Cir.) (274 F.3d 800) (December 12, 2001) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)
  3. Larson v. U.S., No. 00-2455 (1st Cir.) (274 F.3d 643) (December 27, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  4. Brown v. Mayle, No. 99-17261 (9th Cir.) (283 F.3d 1019) (February 7, 2002) (Judge Marsha L. Berzon)
  5. U.S. v. Ortlieb, No. 00-30895 (5th Cir.) (274 F.3d 871) (November 27, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Schell)

More from these topics: