Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Mulder, No. 99-1516 (2nd Cir.) (273 F.3d 91) (November 1, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2002 published in Punch and Jurists January 07, 2002
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Burden of Proof.

This is a case that shows the importance of staying on top of the inordinately complex rules that often apply when district courts attempt to use “relevant conduct” and uncharged crimes as a means of enhancing sentences. The defendants in this case were members of a labor coalition known as ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Lee v. Kemna, No. 00-6933 (U.S. Supreme Court) (534 U.S. 362; 122 S.Ct. 877) (January 22, 2002) (Justice Ginsburg)
  2. U.S. v. Gomez-Estrada, No. 01-1085 (1st Cir.) (273 F.3d 400) (November 27, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  3. Kansas v. Crane, No. 00-957 (U.S. Supreme Court) (534 U.S. 407; 122 S.Ct. 867) (January 22, 2002) (Justice Breyer)
  4. Harvey v. Horan, No. 01-6703 (4th Cir.) (278 F.3d 370) (January 23, 2002) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)
  5. U.S. v. Mulder, No. 99-1516 (2nd Cir.) (273 F.3d 91) (November 1, 2001) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
  6. U.S. v. Astronomo, No. Crim. No. 00-10311-NG (D.Mass.) (183 F.Supp.2d 158) (December 20, 2001) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
  7. U.S. v. Wilkerson, No. Crim. No. 98-10185-NG (D.Mass.) (183 F.Supp.2d 373) (January 10, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)

More from these topics: