Skip navigation

U.S. v. Swan, No. 01-1598 (3rd Cir.) (275 F.3d 272) (January 2, 2002) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)

On an issue of first impression in the Third Circuit (but one which has divided the other Circuits) the court held that despite the “should” language Section 5G1.3(c) of the Sentencing Guidelines and the accompanying Application Note 6, the Guidelines do not mandate that a sentencing court impose consecutive sentences ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login