U.S. v. Golyansky, No. 01-1499 (10th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1245) (May 31, 2002) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
Loaded on July 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
July 08, 2002
Filed under:
Sanctions,
Punch And Jurists.
The great Judge Jerome Frank once wrote: "If we continue to do nothing practical to prevent [prosecutorial misconduct], we should cease to disapprove it. For otherwise it will be as if we had declared in effect 'Government attorneys, without fear of reversal, may say just about what they please in ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- American Library Ass'n, Inc. v. U.S., No. CIV.A. 01-1303 (E.D.Pa.) (201 F.Supp.2d 401) (May 31, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Bunnell, No. Crim. 02-13-B-S (D.Me.) (201 F.Supp.2d 169) (April 22, 2002) (Judge Magistrate)
- Wolf v. Ashcroft, No. 01-1869 (3rd Cir.) (297 F.3d 305) (July 24, 2002) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Stephens, No. 2:01-CR-66-01 (N.D.Ga.) (202 F.Supp.2d 1361) (April 25, 2002) (Judge William C. O'Kelley)
- U.S. v. Golyansky, No. 01-1499 (10th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1245) (May 31, 2002) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 00-4173 (10th Cir.) (292 F.3d 681) (June 11, 2002) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Descent, No. 01-14735 (11th Cir.) (292 F.3d 703) (May 28, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. S2-401CR296ERW (E.D.Mo.) (202 F.Supp.2d 962) (February 15, 2002) (Judge E. Richard Webber)
- U.S. v. Moreno, No. CR597-10 (S.D.Ga.) (201 F.Supp.2d 1264) (April 16, 2002) (Judge William T. Jr. Moore)
- U.S. v. Duarte-Penaloza, No. 2:99-CR-36-01 (N.D.Ga.) (202 F.Supp.2d 1370) (April 30, 2002) (Judge William C. O'Kelley)
- U.S. v. Reyes, No. 01-50737 (5th Cir.) (300 F.3d 555) (July 25, 2002) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- Duke v. Cockrell, No. 01-10232 (5th Cir.) (292 F.3d 414) (May 21, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cunningham, No. 01-1252 (2nd Cir.) (292 F.3d 115) (May 29, 2002) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)
- Martinez v. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 02-40755 (5th Cir.) (292 F.3d 417) (May 21, 2002) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
- U.S. v. Bishop, No. 01-50195 (9th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1100) (May 30, 2002) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Boyd, No. 01-15205 (11th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1274) (May 20, 2002) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Cook, No. 01-15881 (11th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1297) (May 21, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Colon-Munoz, No. 02-1583 (1st Cir.) (292 F.3d 18) (May 30, 2002) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Dominguez, No. 01-1855 (3rd Cir.) (296 F.3d 192) (July 16, 2002) (Judge Richard L. Nygaard)
- U.S. v. Ruhbayan, No. CR. 202CR29 (E.D.Va.) (201 F.Supp.2d 682) (May 1, 2002) (Judge Rebecca Beach Smith)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Clear Error’ Review Applies to District Courts’ Factual Findings for Brady Challenges and Affirms District Court’s Mid-Trial Order Excluding Witness Testimony and Imposing Monetary Sanctions for Government’s Brady Violation, Feb. 1, 2025. Sanctions, Eyewitness Testimony, Brady Rule violations, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Factual Disputes/Findings, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Wellpath Sanctioned for Destroying Evidence in Two Oregon Jail Death Suits, Nov. 15, 2024. Private Contractors, Sanctions, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Evidence - Destruction/Fabrication/Manipulation of.
- Washington Fined Over $100 Million for Delays in Competency Evaluations and Restoration, Feb. 1, 2024. Sanctions, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness), Civil Commitment, Competency.
- Washington Agencies Sanctioned for Discovery Violations Reach $3.1 Million Settlement with Disabled Woman Allegedly Abused at State Sanctioned Home, Jan. 1, 2024. Attorney Misconduct, Discovery, Sanctions, Discovery - Lateness of.
- $6,000 Sanction for Mississippi Federal Prosecutor Who Lied to Court About COVID-19 Vaccination Status, Oct. 31, 2022. COVID-19, Failure to Protect (General), Sanctions.
- Seventh Circuit: Local Rules Requiring Specific Filings to Summary Judgments Should Not be Used as a Sanction, Nov. 1, 2021. Summary Judgment, Sanctions.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.