Skip navigation

U.S. v. Huggins, No. 01-30065 (9th Cir.) (299 F.3d 1039) (August 6, 2002) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)

Here the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not compel the suppression of a series of searches set in motion by an application to scan a private residence and its outbuildings with a thermal imaging device.

In this case, interpreting Kyllo v. U.S., 533 U.S. 27 (2001), the Court ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login