U.S. v. Ruhbayan, No. CR. 202CR29 (E.D.Va.) (201 F.Supp.2d 682) (May 1, 2002) (Judge Rebecca Beach Smith)
Loaded on July 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
July 08, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Attorney/Client.
Here the Court denied a motion to quash a subpoena served on the defendant's trial counsel at an earlier trial based on the attorney-client provilege on the grounds that the crime fraud exception applied under the facts of this case.
The defendant in this case was convicted at trial of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- American Library Ass'n, Inc. v. U.S., No. CIV.A. 01-1303 (E.D.Pa.) (201 F.Supp.2d 401) (May 31, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Bunnell, No. Crim. 02-13-B-S (D.Me.) (201 F.Supp.2d 169) (April 22, 2002) (Judge Magistrate)
- Wolf v. Ashcroft, No. 01-1869 (3rd Cir.) (297 F.3d 305) (July 24, 2002) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Stephens, No. 2:01-CR-66-01 (N.D.Ga.) (202 F.Supp.2d 1361) (April 25, 2002) (Judge William C. O'Kelley)
- U.S. v. Golyansky, No. 01-1499 (10th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1245) (May 31, 2002) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 00-4173 (10th Cir.) (292 F.3d 681) (June 11, 2002) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Descent, No. 01-14735 (11th Cir.) (292 F.3d 703) (May 28, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. S2-401CR296ERW (E.D.Mo.) (202 F.Supp.2d 962) (February 15, 2002) (Judge E. Richard Webber)
- U.S. v. Moreno, No. CR597-10 (S.D.Ga.) (201 F.Supp.2d 1264) (April 16, 2002) (Judge William T. Jr. Moore)
- U.S. v. Duarte-Penaloza, No. 2:99-CR-36-01 (N.D.Ga.) (202 F.Supp.2d 1370) (April 30, 2002) (Judge William C. O'Kelley)
- U.S. v. Reyes, No. 01-50737 (5th Cir.) (300 F.3d 555) (July 25, 2002) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- Duke v. Cockrell, No. 01-10232 (5th Cir.) (292 F.3d 414) (May 21, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cunningham, No. 01-1252 (2nd Cir.) (292 F.3d 115) (May 29, 2002) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)
- Martinez v. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 02-40755 (5th Cir.) (292 F.3d 417) (May 21, 2002) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
- U.S. v. Bishop, No. 01-50195 (9th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1100) (May 30, 2002) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Boyd, No. 01-15205 (11th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1274) (May 20, 2002) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Cook, No. 01-15881 (11th Cir.) (291 F.3d 1297) (May 21, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Colon-Munoz, No. 02-1583 (1st Cir.) (292 F.3d 18) (May 30, 2002) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Dominguez, No. 01-1855 (3rd Cir.) (296 F.3d 192) (July 16, 2002) (Judge Richard L. Nygaard)
- U.S. v. Ruhbayan, No. CR. 202CR29 (E.D.Va.) (201 F.Supp.2d 682) (May 1, 2002) (Judge Rebecca Beach Smith)
More from these topics:
- In New Jersey, Yet More Privileged Phone Calls Between Prisoners and Attorneys Recorded and Used by Prosecutors, July 1, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney/Client, Recorded Calls.
- Eleventh Circuit Revives Claim Against Florida Jail That Forced Detainee to Scan Legal Mail Into Computer with Memory Chip, March 1, 2024. Jail Specific, Supervisory Liability, Municipal Liability, Legal Mail, First Amendment, rights, Attorney/Client.
- Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Asserting Attorney-Client Privilege for Communications from Jail, Including Texts Using Tablets, Aug. 1, 2022. Text Messages, Attorney/Client.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.