Skip navigation

U.S. v. Warden, No. 01-40961 (5th Cir.) (291 F.3d 363) (May 14, 2002) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)

Here the Court rejected a claim that the district court had improperly added a new special condition of supervised release when it directed for the first time in its written judgment that the defendant must share in the cost of counseling services.

Because Rule 43 of the Fed.R.Crim.P. requires the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login