Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Curtis v. U.S., No. 01-2826 (7th Cir.) (294 F.3d 841) (June 19, 2002) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

Loaded on June 1, 2002 published in Punch and Jurists June 03, 2002
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In this case the Court held that where a jury did not find beyond a reasonable doubt the minimum quantity of marijuana to support a maximum sentence, but that finding was made by the court based on a preponderance of evidence, the error will not be disturbed because Apprendi does ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Atkins v. Virginia, No. 00-8452 (U.S. Supreme Court) (536 U.S. 304; 122 S.Ct. 2242) (June 20, 2002) (Justice Stevens)
  2. U.S. v. Minore, No. 99-30381 (9th Cir.) (292 F.3d 1109) (June 17, 2002) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
  3. Ring v. Arizona, No. 01-488 (U.S. Supreme Court) (536 U.S. 584; 122 S.Ct. 2428) (June 24, 2002) (Justice Ginsburg)
  4. Harris v. U.S., No. 00-10666 (U.S. Supreme Court) (536 U.S. 545; 122 S.Ct. 2406) (June 24, 2002) (Justice Kennedy)
  5. U.S. v. Johnson, No. CR 00-3034 (N.D.Iowa) (196 F.Supp.2d 795) (April 23, 2002) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
  6. U.S. v. Quinones, No. 00 CR 761 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) (196 F.Supp.2d 416) (April 25, 2002) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
  7. Curtis v. U.S., No. 01-2826 (7th Cir.) (294 F.3d 841) (June 19, 2002) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  8. U.S. v. Ruiz, No. 01-595 (U.S. Supreme Court) (536 U.S. 622; 122 S.Ct. 2450) (June 24, 2002) (Justice Breyer)

More from these topics: