Fattahi v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, No. CIV.A. 01-1094-A (E.D.Va.) (195 F.Supp.2d 745) (April 2, 2002) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis)
Loaded on May 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
May 27, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Privacy Act/Rights.
Here the Court declined to reconsider it decision reported at 186 F.Supp.2d 656, which held that the ATF had not violated the petitioner's rights under the Privacy Act by disclosing to his condominium that he planned to apply for a gun license.
In a prior order, the court granted summary ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Carey v. Saffold, No. 01-301 (U.S. Supreme Court) (536 U.S. 214; 122 S.Ct. 2134) (June 17, 2002) (Justice Breyer)
- U.S. v. Drayton, No. 01-631 (U.S. Supreme Court) (536 U.S. 194; 122 S.Ct. 2105) (June 17, 2002) (Justice Kennedy)
- Horn v. Banks, No. 01-1385 (U.S. Supreme Court) (536 U.S. 266; 122 S.Ct. 2147) (June 17, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- Fattahi v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, No. CIV.A. 01-1094-A (E.D.Va.) (195 F.Supp.2d 745) (April 2, 2002) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis)
- Gonzalez v. Phillips, No. 98-CV-75600 (E.D.Mich.) (195 F.Supp.2d 893) (December 21, 2001) (Judge Arthur Tarnow)
- U.S. v. Pineda-Torres, No. 01-50133 (9th Cir.) (287 F.3d 860) (April 23, 2002) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- Denton v. Hernandez, No. 02-70339 (E.D.Mich.) (195 F.Supp.2d 937) (April 3, 2002) (Judge Nancy G. Edmunds)
- U.S. v. Mason, No. 01-30538 (5th Cir.) (293 F.3d 826) (June 10, 2002) (Judge Edith Brown Clement)
- Sorrels v. McKee, No. 01-35222 (9th Cir.) (287 F.3d 1213) (May 2, 2002) (Judge Barry G. Silverman)
- Miranda v. Castro, No. 01-56124 (9th Cir.) (292 F.3d 1063) (June 12, 2002) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- Valletto v. U.S., No. Civ. No. 00-4632 (JEI) (D.N.J.) (195 F.Supp.2d 643) (March 28, 2002) (Judge Joseph E. Irenas)
- U.S. v. Flemmi, No. CR 94-10287-MLW (D.Mass.) (195 F.Supp.2d 243) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Mark L. Wolf)
- U.S. v. Haney, No. 00-1421 (10th Cir.) (287 F.3d 1266) (April 22, 2002) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
More from these topics:
- DEA’s Secret Phone Surveillance Program ‘Hemisphere’ Sparked Internal Warnings—Then a Cover-Up, Aug. 1, 2025. Police State-Surveillance, Electronic Surveillance, Privacy Act/Rights.
- Facial Recognition at the Border: CBP’s Push to Scan Every Car Passenger Sparks Privacy Concerns, May 15, 2025. Police State-Surveillance, Electronic Surveillance, Privacy Act/Rights, Searches - Border Stops/Searches, Immigration Law/Offenses.
- Michigan Judge Sued for Jailing Teen Who Nodded Off While Watching in Court, March 1, 2025. Witnesses, Privacy Act/Rights, Judicial Disqualification/Misconduct.
- Maryland Supreme Court Announces Expectation of Privacy Covers Electronic Data, Not Physical Devices, Thus War-rantless Search of Government’s Copy of Defendant’s Hard Drive After Consent Revoked Violated Fourth Amendment, Jan. 15, 2024. Consent, Cell-Phone Location/Tracking Data, Digital Devices, Privacy Act/Rights.
- New Service Highlights Cellphone Privacy Issues, Sept. 1, 2023. Searches - Cellphones/Computers/Internet, Electronic Communictions Privacy Act, Privacy Act/Rights.
- Seventh Circuit: Fugitive Who Leased Condo Under Alias Retained Expectation of Privacy so Landlord Could Not Give Valid Consent for Warrantless Search of Premises, May 15, 2023. Warrantless Searches, Privacy Act/Rights, Drug Laws/Offenses.
- FBI’s Anti-Encryption Campaign Sparks Controversy, May 6, 2023. FBI, Electronic Communictions Privacy Act, Privacy Act/Rights.
- Minnesota Supreme Court Announces Plain Language of Interference With Privacy of a Minor Statute Requires That Defendant Must Have Known Victim Was Under 18 at Time of Offense, March 15, 2023. Privacy Act/Rights, Juvenile Offenses/Offenders, Minors.
- Invasions of Privacy for People on Electronic Monitoring Is a Warning of Worse Things to Come, Feb. 15, 2023. Electronic Surveillance, Privacy Act/Rights.
- DNA Databases Can Threaten the Privacy of Individuals Whose Profiles Are Stored in Them, Yet They Remain a Powerful Tool for Law Enforcement, Jan. 11, 2023. DNA Testing/Samples, Privacy Act/Rights.