Skip navigation

U.S. v. Durham, No. 3:99CR3/RV (N.D.Fla.) (219 F.Supp.2d 1234) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Roger Vinson)

Prior to this decision, the Eleventh Circuit reversed and vacated defendant's convictions for armed robbery based on its determination that the reasons for requiring defendant to wear a stun belt during the trial were not adequately set out in the record. (See U.S. v. Durham, 287 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login