U.S. v. Gonzales, No. 00-10514 (9th Cir.) (307 F.3d 906) (September 30, 2002) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
Loaded on Nov. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
November 11, 2002
Here the Court held that the district court’s ruling that all drugs seized from a drug addict were intended for distribution was “clearly erroneous” since it was plausible that some of the drugs were intended for personal consumption.
One of the issues raised in this case was whether the district ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Glenn, No. 01-1602 (2nd Cir.) (312 F.3d 58) (November 14, 2002) (Judge Barrington D. Jr. Parker)
- U.S. v. Jackson, No. 01-30888 (5th Cir.) (313 F.3d 231) (November 18, 2002) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
- U.S. v. Dumes, No. 00-1482 (7th Cir.) (313 F.3d 372) (November 15, 2002) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- Miller v. Dormire, No. 02-1918 (8th Cir.) (310 F.3d 600) (November 12, 2002) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Bayles, No. 01-4092 (10th Cir.) (310 F.3d 1302) (November 15, 2002) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- Moran v. Clarke, No. 4:98-CV-556 CAS (E.D.Mo.) (213 F.Supp.2d 1067) (August 2, 2002) (Judge Charles A. Shaw)
- Roe v. City of New York, No. 00 Civ. 9062 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) (232 F.Supp.2d 240) (November 19, 2002) (Judge Robert W. Sweet)
- Handberry v. Thompson, No. 96 CIV. 6161 (S.D.N.Y.) (219 F.Supp.2d 525) (August 28, 2002) (Judge Constance Baker Motley)
- U.S. v. Prime, No. CR01-0310L (W.D.Wash.) (220 F.Supp.2d 1203) (September 20, 2002) (Judge Robert S. Lasnik)
- U.S. v. Ochoa, No. 01-50324 (9th Cir.) (311 F.3d 1133) (November 21, 2002) (Judge Melvin Brunetti)
- Matheny v. Morrison, No. 00-3845 (8th Cir.) (307 F.3d 709) (October 8, 2002) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- U.S. v. Gonzales, No. 00-10514 (9th Cir.) (307 F.3d 906) (September 30, 2002) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- Lomholt v. Burt, No. C01-2018-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (219 F.Supp.2d 977) (May 2, 2002) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Reynard, No. 98-CR-2402-IEG (S.D.Cal.) (220 F.Supp.2d 1142) (August 26, 2002) (Judge Irma E. Gonzales)
- Valerio v. Crawford, No. 98-99033 (9th Cir.) (306 F.3d 742) (September 17, 2002) (Judge William A. Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Tolbert, No. 01-50656 (5th Cir.) (306 F.3d 244) (September 12, 2002) (Judge Robert M. Parker)
- U.S. v. Durham, No. 3:99CR3/RV (N.D.Fla.) (219 F.Supp.2d 1234) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Roger Vinson)
- Moran v. Clarke, No. 00-1015 (8th Cir.) (309 F.3d 516) (November 4, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- McIver v. U.S., No. 01-10507 (11th Cir.) (307 F.3d 1327) (September 30, 2002) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
- Curry v. U.S., No. 02-2302 (7th Cir.) (307 F.3d 664) (October 11, 2002) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Gotti, No. 02-CR-606 (FB)(ASC) (E.D.N.Y.) (219 F.Supp.2d 296) (August 7, 2002) (Judge Frederic Block)
- U.S. v. White, No. 00-11392 (5th Cir.) (307 F.3d 336) (September 23, 2002) (Judge Will L. Garwood)
More from these topics:
- Tenth Circuit, Joining Sister Circuits, Announces ‘Personal-Use’ Drug Quantity Doesn’t Constitute ‘Relevant Conduct’ Under Guidelines § 1B1.3(a) and Sets Forth Framework for Burden of Proof Analysis, Feb. 15, 2022. Drug Quantity, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Relevant Conduct.
- Mississippi Supreme Court: Drug Buy Between Dealer and User Doesn’t Constitute Conspiracy to Distribute, Aug. 15, 2021. Conspiracy, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Washington Supreme Court Announces State’s Strict-Liability Drug Possession Law Is Unconstitutional, May 15, 2021. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Denial of Due Process.
- Fifth Circuit: Evidence of Simple Drug Possession Insufficient to Search Cellphone Photos for Evidence of Drug Trafficking, March 15, 2021. Cell-Phone Location/Tracking Data, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Tenth Circuit: Confession Involuntary Where FBI Agent Falsely Claimed to Be in Contact With Judge, and Defendant Could Shorten Sentence With Each Truthful Answer, Aug. 15, 2020. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Interrogation, Cooperation.
- Using Doctor-Prescribed Marijuana Could Send Some People Back to Prison, July 15, 2020. Revocation Proceedings, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Complexity and Lack of Standardization Makes Crime Statistics Less Useful, April 15, 2020. Statistics/Trends, Marijuana Laws/Issues, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.