Skip navigation

Lam v. Kelchner, No. 00-3803 (3rd Cir.) (304 F.3d 256) (September 10, 2002) (Judge Jane R. Roth)

Here the Court reversed the grant of habeas relief because, while there was substantial legal support to support the suppression of evidence based on "the fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine, it was not clear that is clearly estabished law under ยง 2254.

In Hardaway v. Young, 302 F.3d 757 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login