U.S. v. Inocencio, No. CR. 96-221ACK (D.Hawai'I) (215 F.Supp.2d 1095) (May 15, 2002) (Judge Alan Cooke Kay)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
October 07, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Revocation Proceedings.
Here the Court granted the Government's motion, pursuant to 8 USC § 1451(e), to revoke the citizenship of a defendant convicted of naturalization fraud, even though more than five years had elapsed since her conviction.
The defendant in this case was convicted of naturalization fraud. More than five years later ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Walls, No. Cr.A. 92-234-LFO (D.D.C.) (215 F.Supp.2d 159) (August 12, 2002) (Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer)
- U.S. v. Sigmond-Ballesteros, No. 00-50408 (9th Cir.) (309 F.3d 545) (October 24, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Inocencio, No. CR. 96-221ACK (D.Hawai'I) (215 F.Supp.2d 1095) (May 15, 2002) (Judge Alan Cooke Kay)
- Eunique v. Powell, No. 99-66984 (9th Cir.) (302 F.3d 971) (August 23, 2002) (Judge Ferdinand F. Fernandez)
- U.S. v. Reilly, No. 01 Cr. 1114 (RPP) (S.D.N.Y.) (2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19564) (October 11, 2002) (Judge Robert P. Jr. Patterson)
- Marchwinski v. Howard, No. 00-2115 (6th Cir.) (309 F.3d 330) (October 18, 2002) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
- U.S. v. Quach, No. 01-10532 (9th Cir.) (302 F.3d 1096) (July 12, 2002) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
- Kutzner v. Montgomery County, No. 02-20861 (5th Cir.) (303 F.3d 339) (August 7, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Oakes, No. Crim. No. 00-76-PC (D.Me.) (224 F.Supp.2d 296) (October 21, 2002) (Judge Gene Carter)
- Paschal v. U.S., No. 02-2005 (7th Cir.) (302 F.3d 769) (September 11, 2002) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- Peterson v. Cain, No. 00-31047 (5th Cir.) (302 F.3d 508) (August 19, 2002) (Judge Robert M. Parker)
- U.S. v. Gandara-Salinas, No. CR. 01-1652-MV (D.N.M.) (215 F.Supp.2d 1207) (July 26, 2002) (Judge Martha Vazquez)
- U.S. v. Ceballos, No. 01-3715 (7th Cir.) (302 F.3d 679) (August 27, 2002) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- Hardaway v. Young, No. 01-3450 (7th Cir.) (302 F.3d 757) (September 11, 2002) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Ceballos, No. 01-3715 (7th Cir.) (302 F.3d 679) (August 27, 2002) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Minore, No. 99-30381 (9th Cir.) (302 F.3d 1065) (September 10, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cardona, No. 01-30974 (5th Cir.) (302 F.3d 494) (August 16, 2002) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Trial Court Violated Defendant’s ‘Due Process’ Right to Be Present During Zoom Probation Revocation Hearing by Muting Him, Oct. 1, 2024. Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Revocation Proceedings.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Grants Prisoner Credit for Time Served Awaiting Revocation of Supervised Release, Aug. 15, 2024. Good Time Credits, Revocation Proceedings.
- New Data From BOP Reveals Technical Violations Account for Nearly a Third of First Step Act Recidivism, May 15, 2024. Crime, Statistics/Trends, First Step Act, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Revocation Proceedings.
- Eighth Circuit Upholds Key Parts of Missouri Parole Reform, May 1, 2024. Revocation Proceedings.
- Fifth Circuit Announces Revocation Judgments for Violation of Supervised Release Vacated Because Underlying Sentence Vacated, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Resentencing, Revocation/Modification of Probation, etc., Revocation Proceedings.
- Less is More Act Cuts Parole Population by 40% in New York, Dec. 1, 2023. Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Revocation Proceedings.
- U.S. Probation System a “Quagmire” That Sets Defendants Up to Fail, Nov. 15, 2023. Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Revocation Proceedings.
- Convicted Murderer Released 16 Years Early Is Ordered Back to Prison by South Carolina High Court, June 1, 2023. Guard Misconduct, Murder/Felony Murder, Revocation Proceedings.
- Tenth Circuit Deepens Circuit Split on Whether District Courts May Consider ‘Retribution’ in Deciding Whether to Revoke Supervised Release, Ruling It Is an Impermissible Factor to Consider, April 15, 2023. Revocation Proceedings, Plain/Harmless Error.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Probationer’s Due Process Right to Present a Defense Violated Where Denied Opportunity to Call Complainant Who Alleged Sexual Assault as a Witness During Probation Revocation Hearing, March 15, 2023. Sexual Assault, Revocation Proceedings, Witnesses - Examination of.