Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Lott, No. 00-6141 (10th Cir.) (310 F.3d 1231) (November 5, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)

Loaded on Oct. 1, 2002 published in Punch and Jurists October 21, 2002
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.

Defendants convicted of drug conspiracy convictions could not show that Apprendi errors affected their substantial rights because their total length of imprisonment would not have been shorter even if they were properly sentenced, due to the mandatory "stacking" requirement of U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2(d).

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Patane, No. 01-1503 (10th Cir.) (304 F.3d 1013) (September 17, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
  2. U.S. v. Flores, No. Crim. No. 1:00cr10029-NG (D.Mass.) (230 F.Supp.2d 138) (June 27, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
  3. U.S. v. Lott, No. 00-6141 (10th Cir.) (310 F.3d 1231) (November 5, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
  4. U.S. v. McFarland, No. 00-10569 (5th Cir.) (311 F.3d 376) (October 28, 2002) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Norton, No. 01-CR-180 (E.D.Wisc.) (218 F.Supp.2d 1014) (August 15, 2002) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)

More from these topics: