Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. McFarland, No. 00-10569 (5th Cir.) (311 F.3d 376) (October 28, 2002) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Oct. 1, 2002 published in Punch and Jurists October 21, 2002
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Interstate Commerce - Effect on.

In this case, by a vote of 8-to-8, the Fifth Circuit declined to grant a rehearing en banc to review an earlier decision reported at 264 F.3d 557 (5th Cir. 2001) (McFarland I), where the panel upheld the use of the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. ยง 1951) to enable prosecutors ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Patane, No. 01-1503 (10th Cir.) (304 F.3d 1013) (September 17, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
  2. U.S. v. Flores, No. Crim. No. 1:00cr10029-NG (D.Mass.) (230 F.Supp.2d 138) (June 27, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
  3. U.S. v. Lott, No. 00-6141 (10th Cir.) (310 F.3d 1231) (November 5, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
  4. U.S. v. McFarland, No. 00-10569 (5th Cir.) (311 F.3d 376) (October 28, 2002) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Norton, No. 01-CR-180 (E.D.Wisc.) (218 F.Supp.2d 1014) (August 15, 2002) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)

More from these topics: