Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. McFarland, No. 00-10569 (5th Cir.) (311 F.3d 376) (October 28, 2002) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Oct. 1, 2002 published in Punch and Jurists October 21, 2002
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Interstate Commerce - Effect on.

In this case, by a vote of 8-to-8, the Fifth Circuit declined to grant a rehearing en banc to review an earlier decision reported at 264 F.3d 557 (5th Cir. 2001) (McFarland I), where the panel upheld the use of the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) to enable prosecutors …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Norton, No. 01-CR-180 (E.D.Wisc.) (218 F.Supp.2d 1014) (August 15, 2002) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
  2. U.S. v. McFarland, No. 00-10569 (5th Cir.) (311 F.3d 376) (October 28, 2002) (Per Curiam)
  3. U.S. v. Lott, No. 00-6141 (10th Cir.) (310 F.3d 1231) (November 5, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
  4. U.S. v. Flores, No. Crim. No. 1:00cr10029-NG (D.Mass.) (230 F.Supp.2d 138) (June 27, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
  5. U.S. v. Patane, No. 01-1503 (10th Cir.) (304 F.3d 1013) (September 17, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)

More from these topics: