Skip navigation

U.S. v. Patane, No. 01-1503 (10th Cir.) (304 F.3d 1013) (September 17, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)

In Lam v. Kelchner, 394 F.3d 256 (3rd Cir. 2002), the Third Circuit held, in the context of a petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), that it was not unreasonable for a state court to conclude that the “fruits of the poisonous tree” doctrine did not apply ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login