Krimstock v. Kelly, No. 00-9488 (2nd Cir.) (306 F.3d 40) (September 18, 2002) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
September 02, 2002
Filed under:
Due Process,
Punch And Jurists.
In this case the Second Circuit held that a New York Cirt law allowing the seizure of vehicles from those arrested for the misdemeanor cime of driving while intoxicated is unconstitutional. The Court held that the law, ยง 14-140 of the city's Civil Administrative Code, violates the due process clause ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Best, No. 01-4321 (3rd Cir.) (304 F.3d 308) (September 18, 2002) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. Pharis, No. 00-2855 (3rd Cir.) (298 F.3d 228) (July 26, 2002) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Pickard, No. 00-40103-01/02-RDR (D.Kan.) (211 F.Supp.2d 1287) (June 20, 2002) (Judge Richard Dean Rogers)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 01-15691 (11th Cir.) (297 F.3d 1308) (July 18, 2002) (Judge Charles R. Wilson)
- U.S. v. Beckman, No. 01-50288 (9th Cir.) (298 F.3d 788) (July 26, 2002) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Velasquez, No. 01-1599 (3rd Cir.) (304 F.3d 237) (September 20, 2002) (Judge Joseph F. Jr. Weis)
- U.S. v. Zats, No. 00-2757 (3rd Cir.) (298 F.3d 182) (August 5, 2002) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- Andersen v. U.S., No. 01-56900 (9th Cir.) (298 F.3d 804) (July 30, 2002) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Hollingsworth, No. 01-3389 (8th Cir.) (298 F.3d 700) (August 2, 2002) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Pendergraft, No. 01-13057 (11th Cir.) (297 F.3d 1198) (July 16, 2002) (Judge Emmett Ripley Cox)
- Krimstock v. Kelly, No. 00-9488 (2nd Cir.) (306 F.3d 40) (September 18, 2002) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor)
- U.S. v. Cafiero, No. CR. MJ-02-245-JLA (D.Mass.) (211 F.Supp.2d 328) (June 24, 2002) (Judge Magistrate)
- U.S. v. Vallejo, No. 00-15998 (11th Cir.) (297 F.3d 1154) (July 16, 2002) (Judge Myron H. Bright)
- Derman v. U.S., No. 01-2545 (1st Cir.) (298 F.3d 34) (July 25, 2002) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Cafiero, No. 2000MO434 RBC (D.Mass.) (221 F.Supp.2d 88) (June 26, 2002) (Judge Magistrate)
- Jenkins v. Artuz, No. 98-CV-277 (E.D.N.Y.) (210 F.Supp.2d 173) (July 9, 2002) (Judge Nina Gershon)
- U.S. v. Hersh, No. 00-14592 (11th Cir.) (297 F.3d 1233) (July 17, 2002) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Lott, No. 00-6141 (10th Cir.) (298 F.3d 970) (July 30, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Gore, No. 01-51131 (5th Cir.) (298 F.3d 322) (July 10, 2002) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- Haddad v. Ashcroft, No. 02-70605 (E.D.Mich.) (221 F.Supp.2d 799) (September 17, 2002) (Judge Nancy G. Edmunds)
- U.S. v. Casado, No. 01-1488 (2nd Cir.) (303 F.3d 440) (September 12, 2002) (Judge Robert D. Sack)
More from these topics:
- Lawsuit Over Mailroom Abuses by Washington DOC Leads to Policy Changes, June 1, 2024. Retaliation for Litigating, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Photos, Sexually Explicit Materials, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail.
- Misadventures in Mail Censorship, Jan. 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Grievances, Mail, Publications/Books, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Censorship, Prison Regulations.
- Eleventh Circuit Addresses First Amendment, Due Process Interests in Georgia Prisoner Emails, Jan. 1, 2024. Electronic Monitoring, Qualified Immunity, Due Process, First Amendment, rights, Attorney Misconduct/Disqualification, Email and IP Addresses, Prison Mail, Legitimate Penological Interests.
- Federal Judge Says Alaska DOC Policy Rejecting Prisoner Mail Without Notice Violates Due Process, Nov. 30, 2022. Due Process.
- Mailbox Rule Inapplicable to Prisoners Represented by Counsel, Oct. 1, 2021. Due Process, Legal Mail, Periods of Delay, Self-representation.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.