Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Bynum, No. 02-10016 (9th Cir.) (327 F.3d 986) (April 30, 2003) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)

Loaded on April 1, 2003 published in Punch and Jurists April 14, 2003
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Elements of Offense.

In this case the Ninth Circuit rejected a challenge to the facial constitutionally of 18 U.S.C. § 666 (pertaining to the theft of Federal funds), and ruled that a finding of a Federal nexus for a valid application of the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) is a question of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Kaupp v. Texas, No. 02-5636 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 626; 123 S.Ct. 1843) (May 5, 2003) (Per Curiam)
  2. Longenette v. Krusing, No. 00-3690 (3rd Cir.) (322 F.3d 758) (March 7, 2003) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
  3. Silveira v. Lockyer, No. 01-15098 (9th Cir.) (328 F.3d 567) (May 6, 2003) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Escamilla, No. CR.A.B093015109 (S.D.Tex.) (244 F.Supp.2d 761) (January 29, 2003) (Judge Andrew S. Hanen)
  5. Modrowski v. Mote, No. 02-1804 (7th Cir.) (322 F.3d 965) (March 10, 2003) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
  6. U.S. v. Bynum, No. 02-10016 (9th Cir.) (327 F.3d 986) (April 30, 2003) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
  7. U.S. v. Garcia, No. 01-51150 (5th Cir.) (322 F.3d 842) (February 20, 2003) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

More from these topics: