Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Escamilla, No. CR.A.B093015109 (S.D.Tex.) (244 F.Supp.2d 761) (January 29, 2003) (Judge Andrew S. Hanen)

Loaded on April 1, 2003 published in Punch and Jurists April 14, 2003
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Delays in Prosecution of Case.

A nine year delay between a defendant’s arrest and his indictment did not violate his speedy trial rights, because although the extraordinary length of the delay raised a presumption of prejudice, the defendant precipitated the delay by fleeing to Mexico for a couple of years and then “prolonged the delay ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Kaupp v. Texas, No. 02-5636 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 626; 123 S.Ct. 1843) (May 5, 2003) (Per Curiam)
  2. Longenette v. Krusing, No. 00-3690 (3rd Cir.) (322 F.3d 758) (March 7, 2003) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
  3. Silveira v. Lockyer, No. 01-15098 (9th Cir.) (328 F.3d 567) (May 6, 2003) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Escamilla, No. CR.A.B093015109 (S.D.Tex.) (244 F.Supp.2d 761) (January 29, 2003) (Judge Andrew S. Hanen)
  5. Modrowski v. Mote, No. 02-1804 (7th Cir.) (322 F.3d 965) (March 10, 2003) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
  6. U.S. v. Bynum, No. 02-10016 (9th Cir.) (327 F.3d 986) (April 30, 2003) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
  7. U.S. v. Garcia, No. 01-51150 (5th Cir.) (322 F.3d 842) (February 20, 2003) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

More from these topics: