Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Garcia, No. 01-51150 (5th Cir.) (322 F.3d 842) (February 20, 2003) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

Loaded on April 1, 2003 published in Punch and Jurists April 14, 2003
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.

U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2(d) requires that the district court impose consecutive sentences to equal the "total punishment" prescribed by the guidelines, when the maximum sentence required by the substantive criminal statute falls short of the minimum sentence required by the applicable Sentencing Guideline range.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Kaupp v. Texas, No. 02-5636 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 626; 123 S.Ct. 1843) (May 5, 2003) (Per Curiam)
  2. Longenette v. Krusing, No. 00-3690 (3rd Cir.) (322 F.3d 758) (March 7, 2003) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
  3. Silveira v. Lockyer, No. 01-15098 (9th Cir.) (328 F.3d 567) (May 6, 2003) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Escamilla, No. CR.A.B093015109 (S.D.Tex.) (244 F.Supp.2d 761) (January 29, 2003) (Judge Andrew S. Hanen)
  5. Modrowski v. Mote, No. 02-1804 (7th Cir.) (322 F.3d 965) (March 10, 2003) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
  6. U.S. v. Bynum, No. 02-10016 (9th Cir.) (327 F.3d 986) (April 30, 2003) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
  7. U.S. v. Garcia, No. 01-51150 (5th Cir.) (322 F.3d 842) (February 20, 2003) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

More from these topics: