Lewis v. Gagne, No. 1:02-CV-129 (N.D.N.Y.) (281 F.Supp.2d 429) (August 20, 2003) (Judge David N. Hurd)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
August 04, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
Here, in a case of first impression, the Court held that juvenile delinquents detained by the State are covered by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and thus must exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking relief about prison conditions in court.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Warren, No. 02-3110 (3rd Cir.) (338 F.3d 258) (August 7, 2003) (Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert)
- Doe v. City of Layayette, Indiana, No. 01-3624 (7th Cir.) (334 F.3d 606) (June 27, 2003) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 3:02CR146 (JBA) (D.Conn.) (263 F.Supp.2d 413) (May 15, 2003) (Judge Janet Bond Arterton)
- Zimmerman v. Simmons, No. Civil No. 00-3370-GTV (D.Kan.) (260 F.Supp.2d 1077) (April 28, 2003) (Judge G. Thomas Van Bebber)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. CR 102-011 (S.D.Ga.) (260 F.Supp.2d 1368) (May 7, 2003) (Judge Dudley H. Jr. Bowen)
- U.S. v. Mayle, No. 01-3696 (6th Cir.) (334 F.3d 552) (July 1, 2003) (Judge Robert Holmes Bell)
- U.S. v. Torres-Aquino, No. 02-2075 (10th Cir.) (334 F.3d 939) (July 2, 2003) (Judge Terrence L. O'Brien)
- Lewis v. Gagne, No. 1:02-CV-129 (N.D.N.Y.) (281 F.Supp.2d 429) (August 20, 2003) (Judge David N. Hurd)
- Prison Legal News v. Lehman, No. C01-1911L (W.D.Wash.) (272 F.Supp.2d 1151) (June 17, 2003) (Judge Robert S. Lasnik)
- U.S. v. Chase, No. 01-30200 (9th Cir.) (340 F.3d 978) (August 22, 2003) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Sartin, No. CR 01-347-PA (D.Or.) (262 F.Supp.2d 1154) (March 19, 2003) (Judge Owen M. Panner)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Sets Up Circuit Split with Ruling on Michigan Prisoner’s PLRA Exhaustion Dispute, Oct. 15, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Second Circuit: New York Prisoner’s Prior Cases Not PLRA Strikes, Sept. 15, 2024. Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Fifth Circuit: Texas Prisoner’s Declaration Alone Sufficient to Send PLRA Exhaustion Dispute to Trial, July 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Summary Judgment/Judgment N.O.V., Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- $20,000 Paid to Florida Prisoner After Eleventh Circuit Finds PLRA Inapplicable to Claims DOC Removed to Federal Court, Dec. 1, 2023. Settlements, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner’s Dismissed Complaint Doesn’t Count as a “Strike”, Dec. 1, 2023. Complaints, Dismissal, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Fourth Circuit: Dismissal of South Carolina Prisoner’s Complaint Cannot Prematurely Be Called a “Strike” Under PLRA, Nov. 15, 2023. Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner Who Dismissed Complaint Cannot Be Assessed a “Strike” Under PLRA, Nov. 15, 2023. Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Fourth Circuit Says Three-Strikes Federal Prisoner’s Imminent Danger Claim Must Be Evaluated on ‘Totality of Circumstances’, Feb. 1, 2023. Combination of Factors/Totality of Circumstances, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Imminent Danger Exception.