U.S. v. Gill, No. 01-6538 (6th Cir.) (348 F.3d 147) (October 31, 2003) (Judge David M. Lawson)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
December 08, 2003
Here the Court held that simple possession of illegal drugs for personal use is not conduct that is "relevant" to the charge of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance for the purpose of determining a sentence range.
The Court held that, where a defendant is charged with possession ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Shaw v. Terhune, No. 02-16829 (9th Cir.) (353 F.3d 697) (December 22, 2003) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 01-3918 (7th Cir.) (347 F.3d 635) (October 20, 2003) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Alfonso, No. CRIM.A. 01-10468-WGY (D.Mass.) (284 F.Supp.2d 193) (August 13, 2003) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. Moussaoui, No. Crim. 01-455-A (E.D.Va.) (282 F.Supp.2d 480) (October 2, 2003) (Judge Leonie M. Brinkema)
- U.S. v. McCullough, No. 02-3285 (7th Cir.) (348 F.3d 620) (October 20, 2003) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Shepard, No. 02-1216 (1st Cir.) (348 F.3d 308) (November 3, 2003) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- Nelson v. Campbell, No. 03-15095 (11th Cir.) (347 F.3d 910) (October 8, 2003) (Judge R. Lanier III Anderson)
- U.S. v. Stewart, No. 03 Cr. 717 (MGC) (S.D.N.Y.) (2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23180) (December 29, 2003) (Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum)
- U.S. v. Smack, No. 02-2620 (3rd Cir.) (347 F.3d 533) (October 24, 2003) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- Glazner v. Glazner, No. 02-11799 (11th Cir.) (347 F.3d 1212) (October 16, 2003) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Melendez-Santana, No. 01-2386 (1st Cir.) (353 F.3d 93) (December 24, 2003) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- Butler v. City of Camden, No. 02-2903 (3rd Cir.) (352 F.3d 811) (December 18, 2003) (Judge Petrese B. Tucker)
- U.S. v. Gill, No. 01-6538 (6th Cir.) (348 F.3d 147) (October 31, 2003) (Judge David M. Lawson)
- U.S. v. Banks, No. 02-16866 (11th Cir.) (347 F.3d 1266) (October 20, 2003) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- Gherebi v. Bush, No. 03-55785 (9th Cir.) (352 F.3d 1278) (December 18, 2003) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- Padilla ex rel. Newman v. Rumsfeld, No. 03-2235 (2nd Cir.) (352 F.3d 695) (December 18, 2003) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Tenth Circuit, Joining Sister Circuits, Announces ‘Personal-Use’ Drug Quantity Doesn’t Constitute ‘Relevant Conduct’ Under Guidelines § 1B1.3(a) and Sets Forth Framework for Burden of Proof Analysis, Feb. 15, 2022. Drug Quantity, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Relevant Conduct.
- Mississippi Supreme Court: Drug Buy Between Dealer and User Doesn’t Constitute Conspiracy to Distribute, Aug. 15, 2021. Conspiracy, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Washington Supreme Court Announces State’s Strict-Liability Drug Possession Law Is Unconstitutional, May 15, 2021. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Denial of Due Process.
- Fifth Circuit: Evidence of Simple Drug Possession Insufficient to Search Cellphone Photos for Evidence of Drug Trafficking, March 15, 2021. Cell-Phone Location/Tracking Data, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Tenth Circuit: Confession Involuntary Where FBI Agent Falsely Claimed to Be in Contact With Judge, and Defendant Could Shorten Sentence With Each Truthful Answer, Aug. 15, 2020. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Interrogation, Cooperation.
- Using Doctor-Prescribed Marijuana Could Send Some People Back to Prison, July 15, 2020. Revocation Proceedings, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Complexity and Lack of Standardization Makes Crime Statistics Less Useful, April 15, 2020. Statistics/Trends, Marijuana Laws/Issues, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.