Castro v. U.S., No. 02-6683 (U.S. Supreme Court) (540 U.S. 375; 124 S.Ct. 786) (December 15, 2003) (Justice Breyer)
Here the Court held that if a district court “recharacterizes” an inmate’s pro se filing into a § 2255 motion, without warning him that one likely effect of such a recharacterization will be to limit future appeals, it cannot be deemed a "first" § 2255.
This is an interesting habeas ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login