U.S. v. Pimental, No. 99-10310-NG (D.Mass.) (236 F.Supp.2d 99) (December 19, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
February 24, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sufficiency of Evidence.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of mail fraud following a jury trial. Subsequently, defendant filed a motion for judgment of acquittal under Fed. R. Crim. P. 29, and moved to dismiss the indictment under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e).
Defendant claimed that the jury verdict was based on insufficient ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Handschu v. Special Services Div., No. 71 Civ. 2203 (SCH) (S.D.N.Y.) (288 F.Supp.2d 411) (August 6, 2003) (Judge Charles S. Jr. Haight)
- Al Odah v. U.S., No. 02-5251 (D.C. Cir.) (321 F.3d 1134) (March 11, 2003) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- Handschu v. Special Services Division, No. 71 Civ. 2203 (CSH) (S.D.N.Y.) (273 F.Supp.2d 327) (February 11, 2003) (Judge Charles S. Jr. Haight)
- U.S. v. Goodwin, No. 01-3070 (D.C. Cir.) (317 F.3d 293) (January 31, 2003) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Banuelos, No. 01-50051 (9th Cir.) (322 F.3d 700) (March 10, 2003) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
- Padilla ex rel. Newman v. Rumsfeld, No. 02 Civ. 4445 (MBM) (S.D.N.Y.) (243 F.Supp.2d 42) (March 11, 2003) (Judge Michael B. Mukasey)
- Handschu v. Special Services Division, No. 71 Civ. 2203 (S.D.N.Y.) (288 F.Supp.2d 404) (March 12, 2003) (Judge Charles S. Jr. Haight)
- U.S. v. Ahmed, No. 02-51350 (5th Cir.) (324 F.3d 368) (March 10, 2003) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Pimental, No. 99-10310-NG (D.Mass.) (236 F.Supp.2d 99) (December 19, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Cruz, No. 02-2728 (7th Cir.) (317 F.3d 763) (January 30, 2003) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- Dorelien v. U.S. Atty. Gen., No. 02-13587 (11th Cir.) (317 F.3d 1314) (January 13, 2003) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Campbell, No. 00-4134 (6th Cir.) (317 F.3d 597) (January 28, 2003) (Judge George C. Steeh)
- U.S. v. Hodge, No. 01-2198 (3rd Cir.) (321 F.3d 429) (March 11, 2003) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- U.S. v. Mehta, No. CRIM.01-10180-NG (D.Mass.) (236 F.Supp.2d 150) (December 31, 2002) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Announces Invoking Fifth Amendment While Testifying at Trial Does Not Contradict Prior Proffer Statement Nor Does Questioning the Sufficiency of the Prosecution’s Evidence, July 1, 2025. Fifth Amendment, Sufficiency of Evidence, Prior Inconsistent Statements, Proffer Agreements/Statements/Sessions.
- Shelby County DA Oversees Retesting After Forensic Analyst’s Dismissal for ‘Unethical Conduct’, July 1, 2025. Crime Labs, Appealable Issues/Orders, Sufficiency of Evidence, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of.
- From Witness Descriptions to Digital Mugshots: AI’s Growing Role in Policing, July 1, 2025. Sufficiency of Evidence, Advanced Imaging Technology, Profiling Evidence.
- Los Angeles Criminal Legal System Undermined by Months of Faulty DNA Testing, May 15, 2025. DNA Testing/Samples, Sufficiency of Evidence, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Admission of Defendant’s Rap Videos at Trial Was Unfair Propensity Evidence and Orders New Trial, Sept. 1, 2024. Prisoner Media, Sufficiency of Evidence, Social Media.
- Kansas Supreme Court Announces State Must Prove Defendant Specifically Intended to Enter Dwelling in Which There Was a Person to Sustain Conviction for Attempted Aggravated Burglary, Overruling State v. Watson, Jan. 15, 2024. State Statutes, Sufficiency of Evidence, Specific Offenses.
- Aversion to Error: Americans View Wrongful Acquittals and Wrongful Convictions to Be Errors of Equal Magnitude, Dec. 5, 2022. Wrongful Conviction, Sufficiency of Evidence.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.