U.S. v. Severino, No. 00-30161 (9th Cir.) (316 F.3d 939) (January 14, 2003) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
February 17, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Notice - Adequacy of.
An information which alleged a prior felony drug conviction, to render defendant eligible for a mandatory minimum sentence, adequately identified the relevant prior conviction under the circumstances so long as the defendant had no difficulty identifying the prior conviction underlying the requested enhancement. In its decision, the Court noted that ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Perez, No. 02 CR. 854 (DC) (S.D.N.Y.) (247 F.Supp.2d 459) (March 5, 2003) (Judge Denny Chin)
- Alvarado v. Hickman, No. 00-56779 (9th Cir.) (316 F.3d 841) (December 18, 2002) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft, No. 99-1324 (3rd Cir.) (322 F.3d 240) (March 6, 2003) (Judge Leonard I. Garth)
- U.S. v. Crawford, No. 01-50633 (9th Cir.) (323 F.3d 700) (March 5, 2003) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- Whitley v. Senkowski, No. 02-2444 (2nd Cir.) (317 F.3d 223) (January 17, 2003) (Judge Guido Calabresi)
- Byrd v. Moore, No. 3:03-CV-25 (W.D.N.C.) (252 F.Supp.2d 293) (March 7, 2003) (Judge Graham C. Mullen)
- Ewing v. California, No. 01-6978 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 11; 123 S.Ct. 1179) (March 5, 2003) (Justice O'Connor)
- Lockyer v. Andrade, No. 01-1127 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 63; 123 S.Ct. 1166) (March 5, 2003) (Justice O'Connor)
- Smith v. Doe, No. 01-729 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 84; 123 S.Ct. 1140) (March 5, 2003) (Justice Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Severino, No. 00-30161 (9th Cir.) (316 F.3d 939) (January 14, 2003) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. McClatchey, No. 01-3327 (10th Cir.) (316 F.3d 1122) (January 16, 2003) (Judge Harris L. Hartz)
- Ponnapula v. Ashcroft, No. Cic. 1:CV-02-1214 (M.D.Pa.) (235 F.Supp.2d 397) (December 10, 2002) (Judge Sylvia H. Rambo)
- Ainsworth v. Stanley, No. 00-1678 (1st Cir.) (317 F.3d 1) (December 24, 2002) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Sandoval, No. 01 Cr. 307 (S.D.N.Y.) (2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3045) (March 5, 2003) (Judge Robert P. Jr. Patterson)
- Connecticut Dept. of Pub. Safety v. Doe, No. 01-1231 (U.S. Supreme Court) (538 U.S. 1; 123 S.Ct. 1160) (March 5, 2003) (Justice Rehnquist)
- U.S. v. Rebmann, No. 01-5610 (6th Cir.) (321 F.3d 540) (March 4, 2003) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- U.S. v. Carlson, No. Crim. H-99-178 (S.D.Tex.) (236 F.Supp.2d 686) (June 28, 2002) (Judge Lynn N. Hughes)
- Laube v. Haley, No. Civ.A.01-T-957-N (M.D.Ala.) (234 F.Supp.2d 1227) (December 2, 2002) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Strauser, No. 4:02CR82 CDP (E.D.Mo.) (247 F.Supp.2d 1135) (March 6, 2003) (Judge Catherine D. Perry)
More from these topics:
- California Supreme Court: Defendant Has Due Process Right to Notice of Prosecution’s Election to Seek Enhanced Sentence in Order to Make Key Decisions About Defense, June 15, 2024. Notice - Adequacy of.
- New York Court of Appeals: Call Intercepted on Wiretap Not Exempt From Statutory Notice Requirements Simply Because Same Call Captured on Separate, Consensual Recording by Jail, Sept. 1, 2023. Notice - Adequacy of, Evidence - Admissibility/Exclusion of.
- Ninth Circuit Announces Irizarry Didn’t Eliminate Wise Requirement That Sentencing Court Provide Notice of Special Conditions of Supervised Release Prior to Imposing Sentence, March 15, 2022. Notice - Adequacy of, Special Conditions.
- Fourth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity to Prison Official Who Gave Prisoner No Notice Before Hearing That Resulted in Transfer to Security Detention, Feb. 1, 2022. Retaliatory Transfers, Immunity - Absolute and Qualified, Notice - Adequacy of.
- Fourth Circuit: Standalone Rehaif Error Requires Automatic Vacatur of Guilty Plea, June 15, 2020. Notice - Adequacy of, Effect of Vacatur.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.