Skip navigation

U.S. v. McCoy, No. 01-3052 (D.C. Cir.) (313 F.3d 561) (December 20, 2002) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)

One of the more confusing issues in the Federal court system is the scope of a sentencing court’s review of arguments and facts after a remand from an appellate court. Put differently, can the defendant raise, or can the district court consider (either sua sponte or otherwise), issues and objections ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login