Skip navigation

U.S. v. McCoy, No. 01-3052 (D.C. Cir.) (313 F.3d 561) (December 20, 2002) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)

One of the more confusing issues in the Federal court system is the scope of a sentencing court’s review of arguments and facts after a remand from an appellate court. Put differently, can the defendant raise, or can the district court consider (either sua sponte or otherwise), issues and objections …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login