Skip navigation

U.S. v. Sandlin, No. 00-5827 (6th Cir.) (313 F.3d 351) (December 13, 2002) (Per Curiam)

Here the Court colcnuded that the district court had committed plain error that was reversible when it imposed a mandatory sentence on a drug defendant by aggregating the drugs he manufactured on three different occasions to reach the statutory threshold.

Here the Sixth Circuit held that the district court had …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login