U.S. v. Velasco-Heredia, No. 00-50107 (9th Cir.) (319 F.3d 1080) (January 21, 2003) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
Here the Court held that the district court had erred when it determined by a preponderance of the evidence that because the defendant was responsible for more than 50 kilograms of marijuana, he must be sentenced to a mandatory minimum sentence.
Following the Supreme Court’s disappointing plurality decision in Harris ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login