Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Waters, No. 01-3784 (3rd Cir.) (313 F.3d 151) (December 12, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2003 published in Punch and Jurists January 13, 2003
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Crack v. Powdered Cocaine.

Here the Court confirmed the generally accepted rule that, for sentencing, it is not necessary for the Government to show that the substance i question contained sodium bicarbonate in order to demonstrate that the drugs in question were crack cocaine.

U.S. v.Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003) (Judge Barksdale) ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Corchado-Peralta, No. 01-2086 (1st Cir.) (318 F.3d 255) (January 29, 2003) (Judge Michael Boudin)
  2. U.S. v. Fitz, No. 02-1771 (8th Cir.) (317 F.3d 878) (January 28, 2003) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
  3. U.S. v. Rivera-Rodriguez, No. 01-2134 (1st Cir.) (318 F.3d 268) (January 29, 2003) (Judge Michael Boudin)
  4. U.S. v. Sandlin, No. 00-5827 (6th Cir.) (313 F.3d 351) (December 13, 2002) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Waters, No. 01-3784 (3rd Cir.) (313 F.3d 151) (December 12, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
  6. Miranda v. Clark County, No. 00-15734 (9th Cir.) (319 F.3d 465) (February 3, 2003) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)
  7. U.S. v. Gamez-Gonzalez, No. 02-40297 (5th Cir.) (319 F.3d 695) (January 27, 2003) (Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale)
  8. U.S. v. Rivera-Rodriguez, No. 01-2134 (1st Cir.) (318 F.3d 268) (January 29, 2003) (Judge Michael Boudin)

More from these topics: